<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Goldberg &#38; Osborne</title>
	<atom:link href="http://1800theeagle.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://1800theeagle.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 09:41:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Recall of ShapeMatch Cutting Guides Announced</title>
		<link>http://1800theeagle.com/recall-news/2013/05/recall-shapematch-cutting-guides-announced/</link>
		<comments>http://1800theeagle.com/recall-news/2013/05/recall-shapematch-cutting-guides-announced/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 09:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>goldberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recall News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1800theeagle.com/?p=521707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Companies might issue a recall of a product for a wide variety of reasons. The product could be defective, there could be an unforeseen consequence of using it or in some cases, the product could have been manufactured under the wrong set of requirements, which means it has to be redesigned to fit government guidelines. That is what happened with the ShapeMatch Cutting Guide, a product designed by the Orthopedic branch of the Stryker Corporation. Improper Design Leads to Voluntary Recall When Stryker designed the ShapeMatch Cutting Guide, a product that is used to mark the bone of a patient [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://1800theeagle.com/recall-news/2013/05/recall-shapematch-cutting-guides-announced/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Common Medication Errors</title>
		<link>http://1800theeagle.com/dangerous-drugs-news/2013/05/common-medication-errors/</link>
		<comments>http://1800theeagle.com/dangerous-drugs-news/2013/05/common-medication-errors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 09:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>goldberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dangerous Drugs News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1800theeagle.com/?p=521702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately, medication errors are an all-too common occurrence. Medication errors can be dangerous to the human body, where overdoses can cause adverse reactions in patients, such as allergies and even death. Human error and mis-communication, or lack of communication, between physicians and patients are the main reasons that medication errors occur. Medication errors are a very serious matter, but many of these errors can be easily prevented by properly reading labels and taking the time to learn a patient’s medical history. Misinterpreted Abbreviations Misinterpreting abbreviations is so frequent that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration created a reference list of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://1800theeagle.com/dangerous-drugs-news/2013/05/common-medication-errors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Implementing the FSMA Just Became More Interesting for the FDA</title>
		<link>http://1800theeagle.com/personal-injury-news/2013/05/implementing-fsma-interesting-fda/</link>
		<comments>http://1800theeagle.com/personal-injury-news/2013/05/implementing-fsma-interesting-fda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>goldberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1800theeagle.com/?p=521698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever since the Food Safety Modernization Act was enacted two years ago, there has been quite a bit of interest on the part of food safety organizations regarding how the FDA would react in terms of implementing the new law. Consumer-driven food safety organizations that remain watchful have gone so far as to file suit against the FDA for missing its deadlines. In all, thus far, seven deadlines have been missed since the law was implemented. In the end, it looks like the FDA perspective is set to win the day. After the bill became law, the agency was somewhat [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://1800theeagle.com/personal-injury-news/2013/05/implementing-fsma-interesting-fda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insulin Infusion Pump from Animas Recalled Due to False Alarm</title>
		<link>http://1800theeagle.com/defective-medical-devices-news/2013/05/insulin-infusion-pump-animas-recalled-due-false-alarm/</link>
		<comments>http://1800theeagle.com/defective-medical-devices-news/2013/05/insulin-infusion-pump-animas-recalled-due-false-alarm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 08:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>goldberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defective Medical Devices News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1800theeagle.com/?p=521683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a Class I Recall on the Animas 2020 Insulin Infusion Pump. These machines are manufactured to pump insulin directly into a person’s bloodstream. They are used by people who have insulin issues related to a diagnosis of diabetes. This recall was listed during the first week of April and was issued by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The pumps manufactured from March 1 to November 30 of last year (2012) are the ones that have their functionality in question. According to FDA safety information, a component of the machine could possibly sound a false alarm. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://1800theeagle.com/defective-medical-devices-news/2013/05/insulin-infusion-pump-animas-recalled-due-false-alarm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Basic Requirements for Medical Malpractice Claims</title>
		<link>http://1800theeagle.com/medical-malpractice-news/2013/05/basic-requirements-medical-malpractice-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://1800theeagle.com/medical-malpractice-news/2013/05/basic-requirements-medical-malpractice-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 08:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>goldberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Malpractice News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1800theeagle.com/?p=521671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When we get sick or are injured, we seek the care of doctors and other healthcare professionals to make us well again. In general we can fully expect them to do their best for us but what happens when things go wrong? For anyone who has suffered as a result of a surgery gone bad, the feeling of being betrayed by a professional you trust with your life can run deep. Before accusing anyone of medical malpractice though, it is important to examine the situation carefully and seek the counsel of objective parties when we feel that doctors have harmed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://1800theeagle.com/medical-malpractice-news/2013/05/basic-requirements-medical-malpractice-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Avandia: Does it Have Risks for Your Heart?</title>
		<link>http://1800theeagle.com/dangerous-drugs-news/2013/05/avandia-risks-heart/</link>
		<comments>http://1800theeagle.com/dangerous-drugs-news/2013/05/avandia-risks-heart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 08:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>goldberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dangerous Drugs News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1800theeagle.com/?p=521668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The diabetes drug Avandia was thought to be potentially damaging to the heart and was restricted severely in 2010. The FDA is now going to have a meeting in June to discuss the re-evaluation of the safety of this drug by GlaxoSmithKline. Outside experts will be engaged to give their opinion on the safety of this drug. The drug company themselves undertook a study over five years in which diabetes patients on Avandia were monitored. They found that the heart health of their patients was not that much different from patients on other diabetes drugs. However, the results of this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://1800theeagle.com/dangerous-drugs-news/2013/05/avandia-risks-heart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Common Driver Errors in Truck Accidents</title>
		<link>http://1800theeagle.com/accidents-in-the-news/2013/05/common-driver-errors-truck-accidents/</link>
		<comments>http://1800theeagle.com/accidents-in-the-news/2013/05/common-driver-errors-truck-accidents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 15:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>goldberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accidents in the News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1800theeagle.com/?p=521661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The most common reason for accidents involving commercial vehicles is driver error. Trucks are more likely to cause damage and injury in an accident due to their size. If a driving error is made on the road, then an accident is likely to occur. Reasons for Driver Error Commercial truck driver error is 10 times more likely to be the cause of an accident than conditions of the road, weather and vehicle failure. A study done by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration looked at various factors for driver error that led to an accident. Drivers taking prescription drugs or [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://1800theeagle.com/accidents-in-the-news/2013/05/common-driver-errors-truck-accidents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FDA Reports HeartWare Device Malfunctioned, Causing Patient&#8217;s Death</title>
		<link>http://1800theeagle.com/defective-medical-devices-news/2013/05/fda-reports-heartware-device-malfunctioned-causing-patients-death/</link>
		<comments>http://1800theeagle.com/defective-medical-devices-news/2013/05/fda-reports-heartware-device-malfunctioned-causing-patients-death/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 10:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>goldberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defective Medical Devices News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1800theeagle.com/?p=521655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2011, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention compiled statistics from a study which revealed that 26.5 million Americans, or 11.5% of the adult population, have been diagnosed with heart disease. Patients with heart-related problems often rely on breakthroughs in the medical community to help save or prolong their lives. From prescription medication to medical devices, to heart transplants, the science related to heart ailments continues to progress at astounding rates. HeartWare International, Inc., based in Framingham, Massachusetts, is a global company that designs and manufactures medical devices for patients experiencing heart failure. According to the United States Food [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://1800theeagle.com/defective-medical-devices-news/2013/05/fda-reports-heartware-device-malfunctioned-causing-patients-death/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FDA investigates Problems Encountered During Robotic Surgery</title>
		<link>http://1800theeagle.com/medical-malpractice-news/2013/05/fda-investigates-problems-encountered-robotic-surgery/</link>
		<comments>http://1800theeagle.com/medical-malpractice-news/2013/05/fda-investigates-problems-encountered-robotic-surgery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 12:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>goldberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Malpractice News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1800theeagle.com/?p=521651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is often simply called &#8220;robotic surgery&#8221; should more accurately be referred to as either &#8220;robotic-assisted surgery&#8221; or &#8220;computer-controlled surgery”. However, even those terms are misleading. The robotic manipulators that perform the delicate maneuvers required for a successful surgical procedure will not move unless a surgeon is properly positioned at the controls. Virtually every discussion of robotic-assisted surgery focuses on the da Vinci Surgical System, a minimally-invasive surgical system developed by Intuitive Surgical of Mountain View, California. Minimally-invasive surgery, made possible through advances in robotics, allows a surgeon to perform complex surgical procedures using very small incisions, resulting in much [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://1800theeagle.com/medical-malpractice-news/2013/05/fda-investigates-problems-encountered-robotic-surgery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FDA Seeks Cancer Warning Label For Tanning Beds</title>
		<link>http://1800theeagle.com/personal-injury-news/2013/05/fda-seeks-cancer-warning-label-tanning-beds/</link>
		<comments>http://1800theeagle.com/personal-injury-news/2013/05/fda-seeks-cancer-warning-label-tanning-beds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 11:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>goldberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1800theeagle.com/?p=521657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amid increasing evidence of the link between indoor tanning and melanoma, the deadliest of skin cancers, the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a proposal which would require indoor tanning beds to feature prominent labels warning people under the age of 18 not to use them. The proposal, which was announced on Monday, would reclassify tanning beds as class II (moderate risk) devices, making them subject to increased FDA safety measures before they could be marketed to the public. Although the proposal, if approved, would likely not go into effect for at least a couple of years, it represents the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://1800theeagle.com/personal-injury-news/2013/05/fda-seeks-cancer-warning-label-tanning-beds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
